Comparing File Syncronization Apps: Dropbox, FolderShare, SugarSync and Syncplicity
Over the past week we’ve written up some of the desktop file synchronization applications available, and today we’d like to share what we’ve discovered. We chose these applications for their versatility and integration of web 2.0 features, and though we did not choose these applications for their file sharing ability, it quickly became apparent that the developers valued that ability. As you can see from the chart, we judged the applications on usability as well as function, always with a mind to reliability.
In the chart we address the concern for security, sync, and which applications have unique functions for photos or sharing. After the chart we’ll go into it in greater detail, but if you’d like to focus on a particular application, please see one of the full reviews.
| Dropbox | FolderShare | SugarSync | Syncplicity | |
| Platform | PC, Mac | PC, Mac | PC, Mac | PC |
| Mobile Client | no | no | yes | no |
| Data stored with service provider | yes | no | no | no |
| Data backed up by service provider | yes | n/a | yes | yes |
| Data encrypted by service provider | yes | n/a | yes | yes |
| Transfers encrypted | yes | yes* | yes | yes |
| Sharing, folders & files | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Sharing, web links for files | yes | no | yes | yes |
| Web access to synced files | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Mobile access to synced files | yes | no | yes | yes |
| Web access to all system files | no | yes | no | no |
| Revision history/restoration | yes | no | yes | yes |
| Special photo features | yes | no | yes | no |
| Built-in “public” folder | yes | no | yes | no |
| Social network & productivity tool integration | no | no | no | yes |
| File size (sync) limit | no limit | 2gb | no limit | no limit |
| Storage capacity | 5gb | 2gb | 250gb | no limit |
| Starting price, per month | free | free | $2.49 | free |
| Free trial available | n/a | n/a | yes, 45 days | n/a |
| Released (non-beta) | no | yes | yes | no |
*no encryption for remote access
Comparing the applications, we found that synchronization was not an issue; each of the applications performed the task well, and that the real differences between them came from their other functions. All of them worked on the PC platform, and all but Syncplicity could also run on the Mac OS. SugarSync was the only one among the four to include a client for the cell phone, primarily to sync photos taken from the phone with other computers; however, mobile users with data plans could use any four of the services’ remote access capabilities with their phone’s web browser to access their non-mobile files.
All of the applications provide server and transfer encryption, but we found an oversight with FolderShare: it does encrypt files and sync, yet does not encrypt files accessed by remote access, which might make the remote access unusable for some users. As the oldest of the four applications, FolderShare was more likely to fall short of features and support, which could explain why Microsoft is currently sinking its resources into Mesh instead. Lack of security and backup options made FolderShare the odd one out, but as the only application that does not use a third party server to exchange files, FolderShare is best suited to sync critical files that you feel uncomfortable posting to the application’s server. As an interface FolderShare’s sparse style also lacks the friendliness that we have come to expect from web applications.
Conversely, DropBox and the SugarSync are graphically engaging, and without coincidence, the most feature-rich of the four applications. Both were able to do what we asked of them with the difference between them being their state of release. DropBox is currently in private beta and free; SugarSync is public and requires a monthly fee. Unique photo options were available in SugarSync and DropBox, which provide a folder and gallery view. Among the more useful of features was the ability to send a quick link - an url that points directly to a file. With this the days of attaching and then sending a cumbersome file are over, instead an url is sent and the recipient of the file can view it without having to download the sync application.
Syncplicity was not the strongest of the four, but did have relationships established with social networks and productivity tools. This is great for the user that favors sharing and mobility over security, but with the additional concerns over privacy and extended networks, sharing so freely may not be attractive to users attempting to control their files.
Ultimately, SugarSync rises to the top of the list, if for nothing else its stability (no longer in beta), and the storage expandablity. DropBox, which is in beta, offers 5gb, yet as we mentioned is free.
Previously in this series: Syncplicity: Backup, Sharing, Sync
Application: DropboxListio Profile: http://www.listio.com/web20/app/Dropbox/
Website: http://www.getdropbox.com
Application: FolderShareListio Profile: http://www.listio.com/web20/app/FolderShare/
Website: http://www.foldershare.com
Application: SugarSyncListio Profile: http://www.listio.com/web20/app/SugarSync/
Website: http://www.sugarsync.com
Application: SyncplicityListio Profile: http://www.listio.com/web20/app/Syncplicity/
Website: http://www.syncplicity.com
New to Listio? Our tag cloud search offers an easy way to narrow your hunt for the perfect web application or service. No more second guessing of search terms. Just click on one tag, then as many more as you'd like to narrow your search results. It's easy and ensures you get to the listing you want. Finding web 2.0 was never so easy.












